![sapphire trixx r9 290 overclock sapphire trixx r9 290 overclock](https://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph7601/60545.png)
The only non-gaming blackscreen occured after booting to desktop and the screen would sometimes freeze around the time Sapphire Trixx would be loading and then get a blackscreen. I only blackscreen (generally) while playing games. Nothing but headaches since rejoining Red Team (was rocking 6850 CF prior to GTX 670). PCI-Express 2.0 (Since the 2500K doesn't have the 3.0 Controller)Ĭooling: While the aftermarket solutions brought my temperatures down by a lot, they did not resolve the black screen issues.Ĭame from a GTX 670 which worked flawlessly.
#SAPPHIRE TRIXX R9 290 OVERCLOCK 1080P#
PSU: Corsair CX750M -> Rosewill CAPSTONE 750WĢX: DELL 1080p Monitors Tried both HDMI + DVI-D, and 2x DVI-D Configs GPU Cooling: Arctic Accelero Extreme IV + Gelid VRM Heatsinks + AKUST Aluminum VRAM Heatsinks GPU: Sapphire R9-290 (BF4 Edition) Reference Card (290X BIOS)
![sapphire trixx r9 290 overclock sapphire trixx r9 290 overclock](https://www.nexthardware.com/repository/recensioni/887/immagini/Sapphire_R9_290X_TriX_OC_prima.jpg)
MOBO: Asrock Z77 Pro3 -> Intel DZ68BC v28 BIOS
#SAPPHIRE TRIXX R9 290 OVERCLOCK SERIES#
RAM: 16GB (4x4) DDR3 Patriot Gamer Series 2 Meanwhile, those looking for better value continue to be best served by lesser GPUs the GTX 970 and now the R9 390 deliver 80-90 percent of the 390X's performance for only $330.So first off, my specs/config, (I'm going to go through all the crap I had to deal with in order to reach stability but if you want to go straight to what my FIX was, it is at the bottom).ĬPU: Core i5 2500K OC to 4.5 (H55 with 2x 120SP Quiet Fans) And if you simply don’t want to play for team green, we still recommend waiting to see what the Fury X brings to the table. Yes, it costs 40 percent more, but it also delivers 25 percent better performance, which is pretty impressive scaling at the top of the performance pile.
![sapphire trixx r9 290 overclock sapphire trixx r9 290 overclock](https://c1.neweggimages.com/ProductImageCompressAll1280/14-202-145-08.jpg)
So if you haven’t already purchased an R9 290X, this is a tough sell, even with twice the memory.įrom a performance standpoint, at stock speeds, the 390X may be slightly better than the GTX 980 for 4K gaming, depending on the games you run, and it costs less as a bonus, but if you’re really serious about 4K gaming you should look at the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Even AMD knows R9 390X is a stop-gap solution, as they’re already bragging how the Fury Nano will deliver twice the performance per watt as the R9 290X. Toss in the fact that we know AMD’s Fury X is coming out next week, with promises of the standard Fury and the Fury Nano due later this summer. In other words, while the sheer power of a muscle car can really sound impressive, when it gets beat regularly by a smaller car with better handling it loses some of its glamor. It behaves a lot better at stock settings, where it’s much quieter than our old R9 290X blowers. Even with only a moderate overclock, we had to boost the fan speeds to keep the card stable, which made the Tri-X pretty loud. And just to be clear, the GTX 980 can typically hit 15–20 percent overclocks, which puts it firmly ahead of the R9 390X.Īs for the Tri-X, Sapphire’s inclusion of two 8-pin connectors is probably more than is strictly necessary, and we only managed 120/100MHz overclocks. Yes, AMD’s 18 month old design can still compete with Nvidia’s newer GTX 980, but even after overclocking, the GTX 980 is still going to use far less power than the stock R9 390X. The big problem here is that focusing purely on performance is missing the forest for the trees. In terms of bang for the buck, the GTX 970 and R9 390 are the best values. The GTX 980 Ti wins in all the races, but at $220 more than the 390X it's understandably not in reach of many gamers. On average, however, Nvidia’s GTX 980 maintains a lead at 1080p and 1440p settings, but the 390X claims a victory at 4K, in part thanks to the 8GB memory, but mostly thanks to the 30 percent lead in Hitman remove that game from the list and the 980 holds onto a small lead. Of course, we’re running at standardized maxed out (or nearly so) settings, and it’s possible to tune each game to run substantially faster without sacrificing too much in the way of image quality-turning off HairWorks in The Witcher 3, for example, can provide a serious boost to frame rates.